Cycling Inequality: Where Are The E-Bike Adventure Trails? (Part 3) – CleanTechnica

Hi, what are you looking for?
A Deep Dive Into Tesla’s Corporate Governance Approach
Seeing Climate Solutions Clearly Through Biases & Missing Data Is Challenging
Funding Notice: Foundational Agrivoltaic Research for Megawatt Scale (FARMS)
Why Automotive Outlets Keep Butchering Solar Vehicles (& Why They’re Wrong)
Tesla’s Elon Musk Gifted An NFT By Ukraine Government For His Aid
A 1st in the U.S., Unions Announce Deal to Build Offshore Wind Farms (Video)
Seeing Climate Solutions Clearly Through Biases & Missing Data Is Challenging
Study Finds Offshore Wind Could Drive Down Energy Costs in New England
How Spiral Welding Is Revolutionizing Wind Turbine Manufacturing
NREL Builds Out National Capability To Derisk Big Changes In Grid Infrastructure
DOE Launches $84 Million Enhanced Geothermal Energy Systems (Video)
Renewable Generation Surpassed Nuclear in the U.S. Electric Power Sector in 2021
Betting A Billion Dollars On Low-Carbon Grid Transformation Tech
Mexico’s Clean Energy Ambitions Realistic With These Renewable Energy Resources
NREL Celebrates the Powerful Women of Water Power
Refining, Tesla’s Next Frontier
Tesla’s Recycled Batteries: Almost 92% Reuse Of Raw Materials
Debunking Common Anti-EV Myths, Part Two: Responsible Sourcing of Raw Materials
The Metals Company Success: Deep-Water Collector Vehicle Tested At Depth Of Almost 2,500 Meters
Glencore & Li-Cycle Partner For Battery Recycling
Betting A Billion Dollars On Low-Carbon Grid Transformation Tech
“Home of the Future” — Solar Power Home with Electric Ford F-150 Lightning Backup Power (Video)
Buzz Solutions Takes Out 50% Of Grid Inspection Image Effort & Duration
Bill Nussey of Freeing Energy Talks About His Chart-Topping New Book on Local Energy
How A Smart Electric Grid Will Power Our Future
Seeing Climate Solutions Clearly Through Biases & Missing Data Is Challenging
New Law In France: Green Roofs On All New Commercial Buildings
Why Automotive Outlets Keep Butchering Solar Vehicles (& Why They’re Wrong)
One Earth Climate Model Shows How To Cut Global Emissions
US Air Force Makes Diesel-Killing Robot Do The Heavy Lifting
All-Season Tires For The Tesla Model 3 To Keep Things Simple — Turned Out To Be Safe & Cheap
Sold Out! Every EV Volkswagen Can Manufacture In 2022 Is Already Spoken For
Refining, Tesla’s Next Frontier
Tesla Model 3 Owner On Turo Says He Did Call The Police Only To Hear “It’s A Civil Matter” — More Story Updates
Why Is Tesla’s Yoke A “Safety Risk” But Lexus’ Yoke “Kinda Wonderful?”
All-Season Tires For The Tesla Model 3 To Keep Things Simple — Turned Out To Be Safe & Cheap
Bubbling/Peeling Tesla Model 3 Steering Wheel — 25,000 Mile Review Update
Tesla Service — Nothing Much To Do
Rebirth: Quick Review of the Kia EV6
Tesla Full Self Driving Beta: How Close to Level 5 Autonomy?
All-Season Tires For The Tesla Model 3 To Keep Things Simple — Turned Out To Be Safe & Cheap
Bubbling/Peeling Tesla Model 3 Steering Wheel — 25,000 Mile Review Update
Tesla Service — Nothing Much To Do
Germany’s Plugin EV Share Up To 24.3%, Economic Pressures Mounting
UK Plugin Share 16.2%, BEVs Grow 1.66× YoY, Supplies Can’t Keep Up
Germany’s Plugin EV Share Up To 24.3%, Economic Pressures Mounting
UK Plugin Share 16.2%, BEVs Grow 1.66× YoY, Supplies Can’t Keep Up
Sweden Plugin EV Share At 48.2%, Kia Niro On Top
Norway’s April EV Market Share At 84%, Fleet Share At 23%
Top 20 Electric Cars In The World — March 2022 (Charts)
All-Season Tires For The Tesla Model 3 To Keep Things Simple — Turned Out To Be Safe & Cheap
Bubbling/Peeling Tesla Model 3 Steering Wheel — 25,000 Mile Review Update
Tesla Service — Nothing Much To Do
Rebirth: Quick Review of the Kia EV6
Tesla Full Self Driving Beta: How Close to Level 5 Autonomy?
Tesla Q4 Shareholder Conference Call — Watch & Listen Here
Volkswagen Group — In-Depth Conference Call Highlights Company’s Focus On Transition
Bill McKibben On Unions, Tesla, & Elon Musk — CleanTechnica Interview
How To Watch & Listen To Tesla Q3 Earnings Call — Most Useful Livestream
Tesla Sales & Future of Tesla Discussion with Ride the Lightning, Starman, & EVANNEX
By
Published
In Part 1, I introduced the problem of discrimination against the disabled who rely on e-bikes to get trail time. In Part 2, I gave an example of how this problem is perpetuated, despite likely good intentions. Now, I want to offer some solutions we could consider.
The easiest thing to do would be to allow Class 1 and Class 2 e-bikes onto trails, including many that are currently open to hiking because they’re in a wilderness area (my reasons for this and the scientific backing for it are in Parts 1 and 2 of this article). The speed limit of 20 miles per hour would protect the trails, the environment, and other users. E-bikes have to have operable pedals, so this would preclude the presence of faster electric dirtbikes and make it easy for law enforcement to quickly identify people who are breaking the rules. It’s hard to mistake something fast like a Sur Ron, but the lack of pedals would be a dead giveaway.
It would also be a good idea to allow other forms of slow electric mobility on trails. Why? Because not all disabled people have asthma or another condition that’s compatible with an electric bike. Other electric wheeled vehicles, like a two-wheeled scooter with a seat or an electric wheelchair with fatter tires and some ground clearance would allow nearly all disabled people to safely enjoy the wilderness without creating unnecessary noise, tearing up trails, or endangering other users.
Depending on the trail, it may be necessary to introduce some restrictions on the above.
If opening up to e-bikes and other electric mobility might cause traffic jams or later causes traffic jams, a land manager might require users to carry some evidence of non-obvious disabilities. An “Access Pass” allowing free entry into parks for people who’ve shown proof of a qualifying disability could cover a disabled person and others in their party. Possession of prescription medications like an inhaler, a doctor’s note, or something else could be presented to park officials in popular areas to get a pass of some kind for the trails that day. This would allow the smaller population of people with disabilities to gain access while keeping the floodgates of strictly recreational e-bike users closed in crowded places.
Restrictions on the use of throttles, lower speed limits than 20 MPH, or other restrictions may be necessary for safety on some trails. Those would be a lot more reasonable than a blanket ban on all wheeled vehicles or on e-bikes.
Another thing that probably needs to be considered is whether a form of electric mobility is compatible with the trail. Unless it’s a very smooth path, electric wheelchairs like you see in Walmart aren’t going to work and shouldn’t be allowed. They’d just strand a disabled person and create an emergency. Electric mobility that has the right clearance and tires, but that’s too wide, like an electric tricycle, would also be problematic on many trails. So, width restrictions would likely be needed to keep disabled people out of trouble.
It may be necessary for a park ranger or other professional to make sure a disabled person who can’t stand on their own has somebody with them to assist them on the trail should they get stuck or fall over. We aren’t talking about ADA-compliant paths out in nature or in the wilderness, so extra help will probably be needed to get over obstacles, replace a punctured tube, or to do other things that people with more minor disabilities could do by themselves.
For busy places, this would all be relatively easy to implement in person, but for far-flung trails that don’t get too many people are are in the middle of nowhere, this process would require a different approach. In many cases, just allowing slow electric mobility onto the trails would be good enough, with webpages and maybe signs stating the rules at trailheads.
For places where some sort of pass might be needed to only allow the disabled to use trails on wheels, it might be best to implement a web-based system and a phone number someone could call to check in and get a confirmation number. This would be a way to make sure people using electric mobility understand the rules and safety considerations before setting out on a trail. This would also give more severely disabled people the ability to “check in” so a ranger can go looking for them if they get stuck and don’t check out later.
I can’t possibly cover every possible way to take care of issues that could crop up, but the main point is that it’s possible to allow access to trails to more people if we put a little thought in and don’t just go for blanket bans. We don’t want the rules to become so complicated that they’re hard to follow or enforce, though.
On the surface, it might appear that all of this talk about disability is just some ploy to let people use e-bikes and use disability as an excuse. But, we have to keep in mind that not all disabilities are obvious from looking at a person. Someone who looks otherwise healthy might not be able to walk on a trail for more than a couple hundred yards before it becomes a real problem for them. There are so many different ways a person might be disabled and how it might affect them, that we shouldn’t make these sorts of assumptions.
Some of the worst discrimination happens when we erase the disabled instead of seeking to accommodate them. Sometimes, we throw our hands up and say that accommodation is too hard when it’s really not. Other times, we try to move the goal posts when being disabled isn’t a goal at all, but something that most people can’t do anything about. Sure, some people might take advantage of overly easy rules on disability, but that’s better than excluding disabled people. We should err on the side of doing right here.
Finally, we need to keep in mind that the science really doesn’t support the idea that lower-speed electric mobility should be excluded from trails, even in wilderness areas, and even if people who aren’t disabled do it. So even if we’re opening more areas up to people who aren’t disabled, in most cases it’s not going to hurt anything. If there’s no harm to the environment and an opportunity to accommodate the disabled, there’s no reason to not go for it.
Featured image by Jennifer Sensiba.
Jennifer Sensiba is a long time efficient vehicle enthusiast, writer, and photographer. She grew up around a transmission shop, and has been experimenting with vehicle efficiency since she was 16 and drove a Pontiac Fiero. She likes to explore the Southwest US with her partner, kids, and animals. Follow her on Twitter for her latest articles and other random things: https://twitter.com/JenniferSensiba
#1 most loved electric vehicle, solar energy, and battery news & analysis site in the world.
 
Support our work today!
Tesla News Solar News EV News Data Reports
Advertise with CleanTechnica to get your company in front of millions of monthly readers.
If you go onto e-bike forums and Facebook groups you’ll hear lots of stories about being called a cheater. Why? Because you can go…
Form. Freedom. Function. This is the mantra of Aventon, a company focused on designing user friendly bikes that bring as many people into the…
In Part 1, I introduced the problem of inequity in accessing non-motorized trails and wilderness areas. People with disabilities not only can’t effectively use…
Over the last few weeks, I’ve been planning some future adventures. I probably won’t try to go across the country on a bike, largely…
Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.

source

Post a Comment

%d bloggers like this: